TargetTalk Forum Index
in partnership with
  J. G. ANSCHUTZ GmbH & Co. KG     Steyr Sportwaffen     Vogel USA     ISSF TV     Gehmann     Morini Competition Arm S.A.
TargetTalk
a place to talk about Olympic style shooting, rifle or pistol, 10 meters to 50 meters, and whatever is in between. 
maintained and moderated by pilkguns.com

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Toz 35 Modifications
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TargetTalk Forum Index -> Olympic Pistol
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="j-team"]
Anonymous wrote:

I would use a Steyr AP rearsight, they're far superior to the Morini one. The Steyr sight has width and depth adjustable notch and knurled windage and elevation knobs.


Thank you for the suggestion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 5:36 am    Post subject: Looking for a fix for the flyers Reply with quote

Just like on the first image of this post, I am trying to balance the TOZ with an under barrel front extension.

I am also going to try to move back the rear sights, so at this time I left the center of gravity 1/3 on an inch forward of the trigger, but when all is done and I ad some weight to the back of the gun, where is the correct location for the center of gravity on a gun?



front-extension-center-of-g.gif
 Description:
Toz Modification
 Filesize:  141.71 KB
 Viewed:  46 Time(s)

front-extension-center-of-g.gif




Last edited by paulo on Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RB6



Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This was all non scientific from a hand held stand resting on a sand bag at 50 yards.


????????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:43 am    Post subject: Center of gravity of a gun Reply with quote

Please see the picture above for reference. Thanks.
I am looking for the correct location of the center of gravity on a gun?

I am also interested to know if high velocity ammo is a no no for this gun.
I tried just a few rounds of different types of high velocity on my TOZ and the results were very positive, so I am wondering if I should or not use this cheaper ammo on a regular basis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muffo as guest
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
paulo wrote:
...www.gartlandprecisionllc.com


"Custom TOZ Free Pistols
Match Barrels Installed
.............
............. "

I wasn't aware that the barrel on a TOZ-35 is not already a "match barrel". Gartland is just another pimp shop selling chrome hubcaps.





Lets see if you have a Toz that will compare with one built by Gartland. The top 4 or 5 guys in the US are using a Gartland built Toz.


well I think that you yould be hard pushed to shoot better than my toz with original factory barrel. with the compensator fitted and federal 711b's it shoot just slightly bigger than 1 hole groups.
Back to top
L
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with high velocity ammo is the recoil. The more recoil you have, the harder it is to shoot consistently...at least in my opinion. A few years ago, Federal marketed Gold Medal match 22 ammo and some of it shot pretty good. However, the velocity of it was about 100 fps faster than Tenex or R50, and you could feel it. Not many of the FP shooters used it and I think it was because of the added recoil.

As for the center of balance...it is where it is, depending on how your TOZ is weighted. Is there an ideal center of balance? I doubt there is anymore than there is an ideal shoe size. The important thing is to adjust the balance to make the pistol feel the way you want it to. Some shooters like a forward weighted pistol. I used to shoot mine with lead solder wound around the barrel from the forend to the front sight because I liked that balance. If the rod you have gets long enough, your pistol may feel like a tuning fork when it goes off. I knew a guy who put a aluminum rod in the end of his Ham 150, and it vibrated when fired. However, his rod was longer than the flat piece you are using.

Good luck with customizing your TOZ.
Back to top
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I plan to cut the aluminum front extension, after I do the rear sights extension (similar to a Morini 162 short rear sights) that is why I was inquiring if there is a proper center of gravity to "shoot" for.
The rear extension idea is to bring the rear sights to an area above the wrist or close by that point, since that is the last moving point going forward, if you consider that a grip should be static.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RB6



Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The rear extension idea is to bring the rear sights to an area above the wrist or close by that point, since that is the last moving point going forward, if you consider that a grip should be static.


I understand the first part of your statement , what is your point with the second part . What is the point of the complete statement


...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
passer by
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The benefit of a long sight radius is more precision in recognizing errors in sight alignment. The farther the front sight is from your hand, the more exagerated that movement is allowing the shooter to better see sight alignment errors. I can not see that moving the rear sight closer to your eye would be a benefit, but who knows until you try. Let us know how it works out.
Back to top
RB6



Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
since that is the last moving point going forward


What does this mean? moving forward, what is moving ? forward ? what ?

Quote:
since that is the last moving point going forward, if you consider that a grip should be static.



Again, what does this statement mean





...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried the rear sights further back and it helps a lot focusing on the front sites, you do see more movement but this movements is an indication of how much work you have ahead to improve your body stance.
Once you control all the movement coming from feet and leg position/torso rotation/shoulder/elbow lock/"wrist lock"/grip/trigger finger/... you will be looking at the ten ring.

The wrist can't be locked, and there is always some movement when holding a gun coming from the wrist, shooting practice and tools like a Dynaflex help but will never eliminate wrist movement.

As you go from the wrist toward the gun muzzle everything should be working as a single unit and a static form is easier to attain. Thus all the time spent perfecting a grip, to establish neutral full contact between hand and gun. Here only trigger finger should move independent of everything else.

The goal is to reduce movement "completely"so you can hold inside the ten ring (10-10.9 in the x/y planes) every time you align your gun for a shot.

This is a personalized view of what a perfect shot is, since I am not at that level I am working in steps to get there. Anything that helps move less is great.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RB6



Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This is a personalized view of what a perfect shot is, since I am not at that level I am working in steps to get there. Anything that helps move less is great.


Good effort in your viewpoint , don't give up




...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulo



Joined: 21 Apr 2009
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trying not to give up, doubt I will, but thank you for the encouragement.
Here are the mods, 1 3/8" rear sight extension, front aluminum bar for balance, lots of metal out of the grip frame as showed in other pictures.
Absolutely a new gun, specially the reduced weight and better front sight focus, and now time to start all over again learning how to shoot it, hopefully not has many flyers!



TOZ-mod-2.1.gif
 Description:
rear sights
 Filesize:  187.32 KB
 Viewed:  19 Time(s)

TOZ-mod-2.1.gif



TOZ-mod-2.gif
 Description:
rear sights
 Filesize:  160.18 KB
 Viewed:  21 Time(s)

TOZ-mod-2.gif



TOZ-mod-1.gif
 Description:
full view
 Filesize:  91.57 KB
 Viewed:  38 Time(s)

TOZ-mod-1.gif


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TargetTalk Forum Index -> Olympic Pistol All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group